Moral Turpitude

Last week I was accused of moral turpitude. Gross Moral Turpitude is a Medieval legalistic term which referred to "the raping of large numbers of nuns", specifically in numbers in excess of eleven at any one time but a similar act performed on eleven or less nuns is referred simply as Moral Turpitude, and have a less strict canonical relevance. Today, the term is most often heard from sanctimonious do-gooders intent of pushing their own limited worldview onto the larger community, most often in the form of questioning the ethics and moral compass of reasonable individuals who might disagree with them and that's what I took from the conversation that was meant to put me in my place, so to speak. So let me take a few moments to tell you my views of moral turpitude. It's no surprise that some elected officials want to catagorize me as a vile person. Why? Is it because I feel that they should be held accountable to those that elected/selected them to serve. You may consider my posts a bad thing, and I have no problem with that, but I have grown weary of those that have the "we must blame somebody" mentality. I take full responsibility for the things I say, but the comment section is a creature of it's own. Since people have nothing better to do, and when they want to take their focus off the post, they will then sit around and say "well, he let's people say all type of vile things in the comments and since he don't delete the comments, he's responsible. And to that I say, bull (manure). I know why I'm considered a bad person, which is why when I see other bad men/women, I see their deeds and I know their motives. I see Bobby Gibson, Rebecca Hale and Timothy Johnson and all I see are mounds that are just as ineffective and twice as foul as excrement. (OAN: Tim is beginning to think outside of the shared brain of the collective. I don't know if this was just a fluke or he did so because the glue of the Divide and Conquer Coalition was not present at the last board meeting.) I see Gibson, Hale and Johnson as a stain on the City of Lumberton; people that have allowed their lack of moral turpitude to taint the office they were sworn to uphold. They have compromised the people they were sworn to serve and sadly, they don't have the f-ing competence to do bad things well. They don't deserve their position, they don't deserve their place,their title and they don't have the stuff it takes.
Someone was so miffed about my posts that the elected coward had the audacity to wish that something bad would happen to me. Now how's that for righteous indignation? But my response to this person is how small, how pedestrian, how cheap and how cowardly. Does this person realize how little her petty act of defiance register to me. We live in a small town and there's a church on almost every corner and in a town begins every board meeting with a prayer, we have individuals sitting behind the podium wishing/hoping for bad things to happen to another member of their community. The fact that this petty, self-serving troglodyte wishes harm on another person is just another reflection of this person's character, or lack thereof. And to what end? Why would you make such a statement? To make your mundane, inconsequential life mean something. You want to feel. Is that it? You want to f-ing matter? Well, you don't matter. What ever station you occupy, others have given you. You don't matter. You don't have the fortitude to stand on your own. You must rely on others to give you a voice and that why you're so bitter because you know that without the support of your fellow stains, you don't matter and that's your burden to carry. (This post inspired by an episode of Boss.)